F. Candau, Entrepreneur's Location Choice and Public Policies, a Survey of the New Economic Geography, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.22, pp.909-952, 2008.

F. Candau and M. Fleurbaey, Agglomeration and Welfare with Heterogeneous Preferences, Open Economies Review, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01844385

D. Davis and D. Weinstein, Bones, Bombs, and Break Points: The Geography of Economic Activity, American Economic Review, vol.92, pp.1269-1289, 2002.

A. Dixit, Optimization in Economic Theory, 1990.

R. Forslid and G. I. Ottaviano, An analytically solvable core-periphery model, Journal of Economic Geography, vol.3, pp.229-240, 2003.

M. Fujita, Urban Economic Theory, Land Use and City Size, 1989.

A. Glazer, M. Gradstein, and P. Ranjan, Consumption variety and urban agglomeration, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.33, pp.653-661, 2003.

M. Pflüger, Chamberlinian agglomeration model, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.34, pp.565-573, 2004.

M. Pflüger and J. Südekum, A synthesis of footloose-entrepreneur new economic geography models: when is agglomeration smooth and easily reversible, Journal of Economic Geography, vol.8, issue.1, pp.39-54, 2008.

P. W. Rhode and K. S. Strumpf, Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: Local heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990, American Economic Review, vol.93, pp.1648-1677, 2003.

T. Schelling, Dynamic Models of Segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, pp.143-186, 1971.

C. Tiebout, A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, vol.64, pp.416-424, 1956.

D. Zeng, New economic geography with heterogeneous preferences: An explanation of segregation, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.63, pp.306-324, 2008.